[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071001125626.32eb6d0b@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 12:56:26 -0700
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, David Bahi <dbahi@...ell.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org,
Gregory Haskins <GHaskins@...ell.com>
Subject: Re: nmi_watchdog fix for x86_64 to be more like i386
On Mon, 1 Oct 2007 21:27:39 +0200 (CEST)
> > I already did this here by checking for cpu != 0. But it also needs
> > either tracking or forbidding migrations of irq 0. I can take care
> > of the patch.
>
> I was thinking about the same fix. On i386 we already have the irq
> migration / balancing of irq 0 disabled. That's why we setup IRQ0 with
> IRQ_NOBALANCING.
btw doing this is a problem if the user decides to hot(un)plug cpu 0...
he then can't move the irqs away to do that
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists