linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Version 3 (2.6.23-rc8) Smack: Simplified Mandatory Access Control Kernel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <760457.44360.qm@web36609.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Date:	Mon, 1 Oct 2007 13:28:21 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
To:	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
Cc:	Joshua Brindle <method@...icmethod.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	casey@...aufler-ca.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
	Paul Moore <paul.moore@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Version 3 (2.6.23-rc8) Smack: Simplified Mandatory Access Control Kernel


--- Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de> wrote:


> Anyways; if someone wants to cripple their security for some
> performance this way they can surely do this; but i don't think we should 
> offer it as a default configuration option (just as we don't have a 
> CONFIG_NULL_LSM even though there are undoubtedly systems that don't
> care about permission checking[1]) 
> 
> -Andi
> 
> [1] I bet I gave the linux-tiny crowd an idea now ;-)

You would need authoritative LSM hooks for this. The current LSM
additional restrictions model does not provide for this.


Casey Schaufler
casey@...aufler-ca.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/