linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] Extending kbuild syntax

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0710012234420.7130@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>
Date:	Mon, 1 Oct 2007 22:35:35 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
To:	Ingo Oeser <ioe-lkml@...eria.de>
cc:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
	kbuild devel <kbuild-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Extending kbuild syntax


On Sep 30 2007 15:36, Ingo Oeser wrote:
>
>> obj-y-ifn-
>
>This is the only one needed, because it is cumbersome to express
>negative rules in kbuild to include stubs (e.g. nommu stuff). 

Perhaps this would work?

ifeq (${CONFIG_NO_MMU},)
obj-m += magic_mmu.o
endif

>But again this can be done with composition rules right now, but
>is order dependent. If we could get rid of this requirement,
>I would be happy already. So kbuild is just lacking an "else" 
>clause here.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/