lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 14:01:03 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com> To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Mel Gorman <mel@...net.ie>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, David Chinner <dgc@....com>, Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [15/17] SLUB: Support virtual fallback via SLAB_VFALLBACK On Sat, 29 Sep 2007, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Fri, 2007-09-28 at 11:20 -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote: > > > Really? That means we can no longer even allocate stacks for forking. > > I think I'm running with 4k stacks... 4k stacks will never fly on an SGI x86_64 NUMA configuration given the additional data that may be kept on the stack. We are currently considering to go from 8k to 16k (or even 32k) to make things work. So having the ability to put the stacks in vmalloc space may be something to look at. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists