[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <07E3AEH11@briare1.fullpliant.org>
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2007 22:27:52 GMT
From: Hubert Tonneau <hubert.tonneau@...lpliant.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Network slowdown due to CFS
Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> Really, i have never seen a _single_ mainstream app where the use of
> sched_yield() was the right choice.
Pliant 'FastSem' semaphore implementation (as oppsed to 'Sem') uses 'yield'
http://old.fullpliant.org/
Basically, if the ressource you are protecting with the semaphore will be held
for a significant time, then a full semaphore might be better, but if the
ressource will be held just a fiew cycles, then light aquiering might bring best
result because the most significant cost is in aquiering/releasing.
So the aquiering algorithm for fast semaphores might be:
try to aquire with a hardware atomic read and set instruction, then if it fails,
call yield then retry (at least on a single processor single core system).
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists