linux-kernel - Re: Linux 2.6.23-rc9 and a heads-up for the 2.6.24 series..

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20071002152727.GA18550@elte.hu>
Date:	Tue, 2 Oct 2007 17:27:27 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Cc:	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	akpm@...l.org
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.23-rc9 and a heads-up for the 2.6.24 series..


* Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org> wrote:

> On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 04:31:15PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > 
> > * Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de> wrote:
> > 
> > > > Andi, could you please send us the list of patches from the 
> > > > current.tar.gz queue above that you consider 2.6.24 candidates?
> > > 
> > > Everything in principle except the patches marked with TBD.
> > 
> > ok, the ones marked TBD are:
> > 
> >  cflags-probe
> >  cpa-clflush
> >  sched-clock-share
> >  svm-disabled
> >  unwinder
> > 
> > > > (and please add to the list if there's anything else pending)
> > > 
> > > I'm still merging/fixing etc. so the list is not final yet.
> > 
> > please merge it ontop of the arch/x86 tree so that we can start 
> > reviewing and testing it based on the unified tree ASAP. (but sending us 
> > a queue to the old layout is fine too - whichever variant you can do 
> > fastest) Thanks,
> 
> Hi Andi/Ingo.
> 
> I plan to integrate cflags-probe in kbuild.git if there is no 
> objection. And I will address any x86 issues when I do so. On top of 
> that I will most likely do the same change for i386.

great. I think that's the most straightforward merge path for such 
Makefile updates. Andi, Thomas, any objections?

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/