linux-kernel - Re: x86 patches was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.24

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0710021116560.30615@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Date:	Tue, 2 Oct 2007 11:18:39 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	mpm@...enic.com, "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, apw@...dowen.org,
	"Lee.Schermerhorn@...com" <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>
Subject: Re: x86 patches was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.24

On Tue, 2 Oct 2007, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:

> For fujitsu, problem is called "empty" node.

Future SGI platforms (actually also current one can have but nothing like 
that is deployed to my knowledge) have nodes with only cpus. Current SGI 
platforms have nodes with just I/O that we so far cannot manage in the 
core. So the arch code maps them to the nearest memory node.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/