linux-kernel - Re: [RFC/PATCH] Add sysfs control to modify a user's cpu share

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1191363159.29539.15.camel@perkele>
Date:	Tue, 02 Oct 2007 18:12:39 -0400
From:	Eric St-Laurent <ericstl34@...patico.ca>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Dhaval Giani <dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@...il.com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, maneesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Sudhir Kumar <skumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] Add sysfs control to modify a user's cpu share


On Mon, 2007-10-01 at 16:44 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > Adds tunables in sysfs to modify a user's cpu share.
> > 
> > A directory is created in sysfs for each new user in the system.
> > 
> > 	/sys/kernel/uids/<uid>/cpu_share
> > 
> > Reading this file returns the cpu shares granted for the user.
> > Writing into this file modifies the cpu share for the user. Only an 
> > administrator is allowed to modify a user's cpu share.
> > 
> > Ex: 
> > 	# cd /sys/kernel/uids/
> > 	# cat 512/cpu_share
> > 	1024
> > 	# echo 2048 > 512/cpu_share
> > 	# cat 512/cpu_share
> > 	2048
> > 	#
> 
> looks good to me! I think this API is pretty straightforward. I've put 
> this into my tree and have updated the sched-devel git tree:
> 

While a sysfs interface is OK and somewhat orthogonal to the interface
proposed the containers patches, I think maybe a new syscall should be
considered.

Since we now have a fair share cpu scheduler, maybe an interface to
specify the cpu share directly (alternatively to priority) make sense.

For processes, it may become more intuitive (and precise) to set the
processing share directly than setting a priority which is converted to
a share.

Maybe something similar to ioprio_set() and ioprio_get() syscalls:

- per user cpu share
- per user group cpu share
- per process cpu share
- per process group cpu share


Best regards,

- Eric


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/