linux-kernel - pgd_none_or_clear

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 2 Oct 2007 17:20:03 -0500
From:	Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
To:	Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>, Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: pgd_none_or_clear_bad strangeness?

In lib/pagewalk.c, I've been using the various forms of
{pgd,pud,pmd}_none_or_clear_bad while walking page tables as that
seemed the canonical way to do things. Lately (eg with -rc7-mm1),
these have been triggering messages like "bad pgd 0x01e3" and causing
nasty double faults. It appears this is actually triggered at the pmd
level (mm/memory.c:116), though it appears to produce the wrong
message.

Has something changed here? I'm pretty sure this used to work! Is this
not a kosher thing to do? Does it make any sense I'd repeatedly run
into a bad pmd in the middle of bash's page table right after boot?
The simple _none variant seems to work, but I worry that it's papering
over a real problem.

-- 
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/