linux-kernel - Re: Point of gpl-only modules (flame)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 3 Oct 2007 00:58:28 +0200
From:	Olivier Galibert <galibert@...ox.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Point of gpl-only modules (flame)

On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 11:49:04PM +0200, Jimmy wrote:
> Also, how about a list of PROS, explain to me whats so cool about it?

People who do binary-only drivers have a much better chance of not
doing a derivative work when they only use non-EXPORT_GPL exports, and
as a result not being in the wrong legally.

  OG.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/