[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071002073703.GA31108@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 09:37:03 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mpm@...enic.com, "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: x86 patches was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.24
* Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On 02 Oct 2007 08:18:17 +0200 Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> wrote:
>
> > The clockevents patches are not included in this; but given the
> > recent trouble i'm not 100% sure they are even ready yet.
i'm curious, which "recent trouble" do you refer to? (The NMI watchdog
bug [which is off by default] was fixed quickly. The C1E bug was found
and fixed quickly. Anything else i missed?)
> hm, well, I hope you and Thomas are on the same page regarding
> precisely what the remaining issues are.
i'd like to see the 64-bit clockevents (& dynticks) patches merged.
Demand from users and distros is high: the 64-bit CE patches are merged
into the Fedora 8 and Ubuntu kernels already, it's been in -mm and in
-rt too for a long time and powertop users demand it as well. It also
makes it obviously easier to unify the 64-bit and 32-bit code. So
there's multiple good reasons to do it.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists