[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071002074635.GA31066@one.firstfloor.org>
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 09:46:35 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mpm@...enic.com, "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: x86 patches was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.24
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 09:37:03AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> > On 02 Oct 2007 08:18:17 +0200 Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> wrote:
> >
> > > The clockevents patches are not included in this; but given the
> > > recent trouble i'm not 100% sure they are even ready yet.
>
> i'm curious, which "recent trouble" do you refer to? (The NMI watchdog
> bug [which is off by default] was fixed quickly. The C1E bug was found
> and fixed quickly. Anything else i missed?)
C1e and now the misrouted irq 0s Thomas reported.
Also i'm a little worried about the missing C1e check; it looks
like it needs a re-review to make sure not other infrastructure was
missing.
>
> > hm, well, I hope you and Thomas are on the same page regarding
> > precisely what the remaining issues are.
>
> i'd like to see the 64-bit clockevents (& dynticks) patches merged.
> Demand from users and distros is high.
I'm aware of that. No argument on that it will eventually go in.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists