lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 2 Oct 2007 09:46:35 +0200
From:	Andi Kleen <>
To:	Ingo Molnar <>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <>,
	Andi Kleen <>,,, "Huang, Ying" <>,
	Thomas Gleixner <>,
	Christoph Lameter <>,
	Arjan van de Ven <>
Subject: Re: x86 patches was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.24

On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 09:37:03AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Andrew Morton <> wrote:
> > On 02 Oct 2007 08:18:17 +0200 Andi Kleen <> wrote:
> >
> > > The clockevents patches are not included in this; but given the 
> > > recent trouble i'm not 100% sure they are even ready yet.
> i'm curious, which "recent trouble" do you refer to? (The NMI watchdog 
> bug [which is off by default] was fixed quickly. The C1E bug was found 
> and fixed quickly. Anything else i missed?)

C1e and now the misrouted irq 0s Thomas reported.

Also i'm a little worried about the missing C1e check; it looks
like it needs a re-review to make sure not other infrastructure was 

> > hm, well, I hope you and Thomas are on the same page regarding 
> > precisely what the remaining issues are.
> i'd like to see the 64-bit clockevents (& dynticks) patches merged. 
> Demand from users and distros is high.

I'm aware of that. No argument on that it will eventually go in.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists