[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20071003035853.c5a777e2.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 03:58:53 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
Cc: "Torvalds, Linus" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: remove zero_page (was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.24)
On Wed, 3 Oct 2007 03:45:09 +1000 Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au> wrote:
> > mm-use-pagevec-to-rotate-reclaimable-page.patch
> > mm-use-pagevec-to-rotate-reclaimable-page-fix.patch
> > mm-use-pagevec-to-rotate-reclaimable-page-fix-2.patch
> > mm-use-pagevec-to-rotate-reclaimable-page-fix-function-declaration.patch
> > mm-use-pagevec-to-rotate-reclaimable-page-fix-bug-at-include-linux-mmh220.p
> >atch
> > mm-use-pagevec-to-rotate-reclaimable-page-kill-redundancy-in-rotate_reclaim
> >able_page.patch
> > mm-use-pagevec-to-rotate-reclaimable-page-move_tail_pages-into-lru_add_drai
> >n.patch
> >
> > I guess I'll merge this. Would be nice to have wider perfromance testing
> > but I guess it'll be easy enough to undo.
>
> Care to give it one more round through -mm? Is it easy enough to
> keep?
Yup. Nobody has done much with that code in ages.
> I haven't had a chance to review it, which I'd like to do at some
> point (and I don't think it would hurt to have a bit more testing).
Sure.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists