linux-kernel - Re: [TOMOYO 05/15](repost) Domain transition handler functions.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 3 Oct 2007 07:39:49 -0700 (PDT)
From:	James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
To:	YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 
	<yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
cc:	penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
	kaigai@...gai.gr.jp, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, chrisw@...s-sol.org
Subject: Re: [TOMOYO 05/15](repost) Domain transition handler functions.

On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / µÈÆ£±ÑÌÀ wrote:

> In article <200710032326.FJF32915.OQOOHLMtFSFJFV@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp> (at Wed, 3 Oct 2007 23:26:57 +0900), Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp> says:
> 
> > Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > Also, how do you avoid referencing dead data with your sll? I haven't
> > > actually looked at your patches, but the simple scheme you outlined
> > > didn't handle the iteration + concurrent removal scenario:
> > Regarding my singly-linked list, no entries are removed from the list. It's append only (like CD-R media).
> > I set is_deleted flag of a entry instead of removing the entry from the list.
> 
> It is not a good practice.  Please free such objects.
> BTW, how many objects do you have in the list?

Doesn't matter.  No list should be able to grow without bounds in the 
kernel.

-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@...ei.org>