linux-kernel - Re: sata_sil24 broken since 2.6.23-rc4-mm1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <64bb37e0710030821u56157ad1s6252ee01e050c7d5@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 3 Oct 2007 17:21:13 +0200
From:	"Torsten Kaiser" <just.for.lkml@...glemail.com>
To:	"Tejun Heo" <htejun@...il.com>
Cc:	"Jeff Garzik" <jeff@...zik.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: sata_sil24 broken since 2.6.23-rc4-mm1

On 10/1/07, Torsten Kaiser <just.for.lkml@...glemail.com> wrote:
> On 9/30/07, Torsten Kaiser <just.for.lkml@...glemail.com> wrote:
> > On 9/30/07, Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com> wrote:
> > > Torsten Kaiser wrote:
> To make that comment "cmd part of the output was always the same" more
> clear: I did not only mean that the first (cmd-)byte was the same, but
> the whole line:
> cmd 61/08:00:09:d6:42/00:00:25:00:00/40 tag 0 cdb 0x0 data 4096 out
>
> I did find ATA_CMD_FPDMA_WRITE = 0x61in ata.h, but I don't find a good
> hint for the 08 that follows. The interpretation XFER_PIO_0 = 0x08
> seems wrong...

Even all of the last bisect steps still showed the same line...

> If I look at what patches remain, it seems that some other (earlier)
> patch that is new in 2.6.23-rc4-mm1 is the trigger, but it will only
> fail together with a second patch.

I'm now finished with bisecting, still 2 patches, but I don't want to
spend another two hours waiting...

And the winners are: (from broken-out patchset of 2.6.23-rc4-mm1)
maps2-simplify-interdependence-of-proc-pid-maps-and-smaps.patch
maps2-move-clear_refs-code-to-task_mmuc.patch

Before these patches I have never seen the bug, with these I only got
two good boots when trying to recreate the problem. But even the
kernels that did one good boot failed on the second try.

> > As for you printk:
>From the last testkernel (up to incl.
maps2-move-clear_refs-code-to-task_mmuc.patch)

Good:
Oct  3 15:50:39 treogen [    3.780000] XXX sil24 cb=ffff810005dd0000
cb_dma=5dd0000
Oct  3 15:50:39 treogen [    3.790000] XXX sil24 cb=ffff810005de0000
cb_dma=5de0000

Bad:
Oct  3 16:56:46 treogen [    3.750000] XXX sil24 cb=ffff810005de0000
cb_dma=5de0000
Oct  3 16:56:46 treogen [    3.760000] XXX sil24 cb=ffff810005df0000
cb_dma=5df0000

I have *NO* clue how these procfs changes can kill the sata_sil24
driver, but all bisect steps point to these two patches as cause or
trigger of the bug.

Torsten
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/