[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0710031825250.22106@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 18:25:37 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
cc: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>,
Alexander Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [bug] crash when reading /proc/mounts (was: Re: Linux 2.6.23-rc9
and a heads-up for the 2.6.24 series..)
On Oct 3 2007 09:09, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Alan Cox wrote:
>>
>> > and btw, there is no question what-so-ever about whether your compiler
>> > might be doing a legal optimization - the compiler really is wrong, and is
>>
>> Pedant: valid. Almost all optimizations are legal, nobody has yet written
>> laws about compilers. Sorry but I'm forever fixing misuse of the word
>> "illegal" in printks, docs and the like and it gets annoying after a bit.
>
>Heh.
>
>When I'm ruler of the universe, it *will* be illegal. I'm just getting a
>bit ahead of myself.
Any time frame when that will happen?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists