[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20071003104640.85c8208b.pj@sgi.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 10:46:40 -0700
From: Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
To: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, menage@...gle.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dino@...ibm.com, cpw@....com,
mingo@...e.hu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpuset and sched domains: sched_load_balance flag
Nick wrote:
> So if a new pdflush is spawned, it get's moved to some cpuset? That
> probably isn't something these realtime systems want to do (ie. the
> non-realtime portion probably doesn't want to have any sort of scheduler
> or even worry about cpusets at all).
No - the new pdflush is put in the same cpuset as its parent, with a
patch that I sent in early this year. See the following code in
mm/pdflush.c:
/*
* Some configs put our parent kthread in a limited cpuset,
* which kthread() overrides, forcing cpus_allowed == CPU_MASK_ALL.
* Our needs are more modest - cut back to our cpusets cpus_allowed.
* This is needed as pdflush's are dynamically created and destroyed.
* The boottime pdflush's are easily placed w/o these 2 lines.
*/
cpus_allowed = cpuset_cpus_allowed(current);
set_cpus_allowed(current, cpus_allowed);
return __pdflush(&my_work);
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@....com> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists