[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <384003.93417.qm@web36611.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 14:06:13 -0700 (PDT)
From: Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, casey@...aufler-ca.com
Cc: Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>, torvalds@...l.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...l.org, paul.moore@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Version 4 (2.6.23-rc8-mm2) Smack: Simplified Mandatory Access Control Kernel
--- Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
> > An embedded system that does not have user logins but that does
> > have applications that require separation, perhaps a moble communication
> > device with application download capability, is just one example
> > where the smack symlink implementation provides the required
> > function without requiring application support.
>
> I don't see what is such a problem here. For your mobile example you'd
> give the application download side its own /tmp via mount.
>
> Its actually better this is done in user space as its more flexible that
> way and can be tuned arbitarily to meet interesting or bizarre real world
> cases.
I admit to being impressed by the wide variety of mount options
currently available. In many cases this will be the best approach.
/tmp is a typical use for a smack symlink, but not the only one.
Casey Schaufler
casey@...aufler-ca.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists