linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -mm] intel-iommu sg chaining support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20071003141203.fae1edf5.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Wed, 3 Oct 2007 14:12:03 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	"Keshavamurthy, Anil S" <anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com>
Cc:	tomof@....org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jens.axboe@...cle.com,
	fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm] intel-iommu sg chaining support

On Mon, 1 Oct 2007 09:12:56 -0700
"Keshavamurthy, Anil S" <anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com> wrote:

> On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 05:16:38AM -0700, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > 
> >    x86_64 defines ARCH_HAS_SG_CHAIN. So if IOMMU implementations don't
> >    support sg chaining, we will get data corruption.
> >    Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
> 
> Acked-by: Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com>
> 

Am I correct in believing that this patch is needed only when the
chaining patches which are presently in git-block are combined with the
intel-iommu work which is presently in -mm?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/