lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071003042509.GG8181@ftp.linux.org.uk>
Date:	Wed, 3 Oct 2007 05:25:09 +0100
From:	Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] fix bogus reporting of signals by audit

	Async signals should not be reported as sent by current in
audit log.  As it is, we call audit_signal_info() too early in
check_kill_permission().  Note that check_kill_permission() has that
test already - it needs to know if it should apply current-based
permission checks.  So the solution is to move the call of audit_signal_info()
between those.
	Bogosity in question is easily reproduced - add a rule watching for
e.g. kill(2) from specific process (so that audit_signal_info() would not
short-circuit to nothing), say load_policy, watch the bogus OBJ_PID entry
in audit logs claiming that write(2) on selinuxfs file issued by load_policy(8)
had somehow managed to send a signal to syslogd...

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Acked-by: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@...hat.com>
Acked-by: Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>
---
diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c
index 9fb91a3..7929523 100644
--- a/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/kernel/signal.c
@@ -531,18 +531,18 @@ static int check_kill_permission(int sig, struct siginfo *info,
 	if (!valid_signal(sig))
 		return error;
 
-	error = audit_signal_info(sig, t); /* Let audit system see the signal */
-	if (error)
-		return error;
-
-	error = -EPERM;
-	if ((info == SEND_SIG_NOINFO || (!is_si_special(info) && SI_FROMUSER(info)))
-	    && ((sig != SIGCONT) ||
-		(process_session(current) != process_session(t)))
-	    && (current->euid ^ t->suid) && (current->euid ^ t->uid)
-	    && (current->uid ^ t->suid) && (current->uid ^ t->uid)
-	    && !capable(CAP_KILL))
+	if (info == SEND_SIG_NOINFO || (!is_si_special(info) && SI_FROMUSER(info))) {
+		error = audit_signal_info(sig, t); /* Let audit system see the signal */
+		if (error)
+			return error;
+		error = -EPERM;
+		if (((sig != SIGCONT) ||
+			(process_session(current) != process_session(t)))
+		    && (current->euid ^ t->suid) && (current->euid ^ t->uid)
+		    && (current->uid ^ t->suid) && (current->uid ^ t->uid)
+		    && !capable(CAP_KILL))
 		return error;
+	}
 
 	return security_task_kill(t, info, sig, 0);
 }
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists