[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200710022214.55381.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 22:14:54 +1000
From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
To: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Kirill Korotaev <dev@...nvz.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
devel@...nvz.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mark read_crX() asm code as volatile
On Wednesday 03 October 2007 04:27, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> On 10/02/2007 11:28 AM, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > On Tue, 02 Oct 2007 18:08:32 +0400
> >
> > Kirill Korotaev <dev@...nvz.org> wrote:
> >> Some gcc versions (I checked at least 4.1.1 from RHEL5 & 4.1.2 from
> >> gentoo) can generate incorrect code with read_crX()/write_crX()
> >> functions mix up, due to cached results of read_crX().
> >
> > I'm not so sure volatile is the right answer, as compared to giving the
> > asm more strict contraints....
> >
> > asm volatile tends to mean something else than "the result has
> > changed"....
>
> It means "don't eliminate this code if it's reachable" which should be
> just enough for this case. But it could still be reordered in some cases
> that could break, I think.
>
> This should work because the result gets used before reading again:
>
> read_cr3(a);
> write_cr3(a | 1);
> read_cr3(a);
>
> But this might be reordered so that b gets read before the write:
>
> read_cr3(a);
> write_cr3(a | 1);
> read_cr3(b);
>
> ?
I don't see how, as write_cr3 clobbers memory.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists