linux-kernel - Re: wibbling over the cpuset shed domain connnection

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200710022236.59583.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Date:	Tue, 2 Oct 2007 22:36:59 +1000
From:	Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
To:	Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: wibbling over the cpuset shed domain connnection

On Tuesday 02 October 2007 07:34, Paul Jackson wrote:
> In -mm merge plans for 2.6.24, Andrew wrote:
> > cpuset-remove-sched-domain-hooks-from-cpusets.patch
> >
> >   Paul continues to wibble over this.  Hold, I guess.
>
> Oh dear ... after looking at the following to figure out what
> a wibble is, I wonder which one Andrew had in mind:
>
>   http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=wibble
>
> The insanity, the rubbish, being overwhelmed, ... ?
>
> <grin>
>
> If one of Nick or I can knock some sense into the others head,
> then this saga should come to a close soon.

In the meantime, that patch should be merged though, shouldn't it?
cpusets is currently telling the scheduler to do the wrong thing WRT
the user interface definition of cpusets, right?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/