[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200710041101.46794.ak@suse.de>
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 11:01:46 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
To: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Document x86-64 iommu kernel parameters
On Wednesday 03 October 2007 18:58, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> On 10/03/2007 12:10 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >> Maybe we can/should merge the doc files along with the x86 arch merge.
> >
> > Well, the x86 merge is pretty much mechanical. It should be followed up
> > with a lot of manual merging.
>
> It would be really nice if identical kernel parameters used the same names,
> so people didn't waste their time trying e.g. "nolapic_timer" on x86_64
> because that option fixed their problems on i386 (it's "noapictimer" in
> x86_64.)
Well the x86-64 option was there first; you have to ask whoever
added the i386 option why they used a different name
But I normally added aliases as people reported them. Nobody did in
this case.
One reason is probably that noapictimer is not very useful on x86-64 --
the nolapic_timer is really more a workaround that only started making
sense on HRT because it made "apicmaintimer" default.
On current x86-64 which doesn't do that there is very little reason to use it
and you'll usually just break things.
So I guess the real reason is that they're not actually identical
when you look closely.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists