linux-kernel - Re: CodingStyle: mention bitfields/whitespace style, prefer (!foo) in examples

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20071004101901.GK22940@elf.ucw.cz>
Date:	Thu, 4 Oct 2007 12:19:01 +0200
From:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
	kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: CodingStyle: mention bitfields/whitespace style, prefer (!foo)
	in examples

On Thu 2007-10-04 11:51:35, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> 
> On Oct 4 2007 11:44, Pavel Machek wrote:
> >diff --git a/Documentation/CodingStyle b/Documentation/CodingStyle
> >index 7f1730f..1595a45 100644
> >--- a/Documentation/CodingStyle
> >+++ b/Documentation/CodingStyle
> >@@ -71,6 +71,15 @@ used for indentation, and the above exam
> > 
> > Get a decent editor and don't leave whitespace at the end of lines.
> > 
> >+Bitfield variables should be indented like this:
> >+
> >+	unsigned int foo :1;
> 
> Current code uses foo:1.

I'm fine with foo :1 or foo:1. It just would be nice to have example
specifying one way...
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/