[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20071004214730.6f6ff3ef.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 21:47:30 +0900
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To: Shi Weihua <shiwh@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: mikpe@...uu.se, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] signal(i386): alternative signal stack wraparound
occurs
On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 21:33:12 +0900
Shi Weihua <shiwh@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
> KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote::
> > On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 20:56:14 +0900
> > Shi Weihua <shiwh@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
> >
> >> stack.ss_sp = addr + pagesize;
> >> stack.ss_flags = 0;
> >> stack.ss_size = pagesize;
> > Here is bad.
> > stack,ss_sp = addr;
> > stack.ss_flags = 0;
> > stack.ss_size = pagesize * 2;
> [What the test code want to do]
> addr+pagesize*2 - addr+pagesize -> sigaltstack
> addr+pagesize - addr -> protected region
> The code want to catch overflow when esp enter the protected region.
>
You have to protect the top of *registered* sigaltstack.
The reason of wraparound is %esp will be set to the bottom of sigaltstack
if it is not on sigaltstack area when signaled.
What you have to do is protect the top of registerd sigaltstack.
If %esp is in the range of registerd sigaltstack at SEGV, wraparound
will stop.
Thanks,
-Kame
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists