linux-kernel - Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 4 Oct 2007 12:46:04 -0700
From:	"Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
To:	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
Cc:	Matthew Wilcox <willy@...ux.intel.com>,
	Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Mel Gorman <mel@...net.ie>,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	David Chinner <dgc@....com>,
	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>, suresh.b.siddha@...el.com
Subject: Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB

On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 12:05:35PM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > > Was the page allocator pass through patchset 
> > > separately applied as I requested?
> > 
> > I don't believe so.  Suresh?
> 
> If it was a git pull then the pass through was included and never taken 
> out.

It was a git pull from the performance branch that you pointed out earlier
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/christoph/slab.git;a=log;h=performance

and the config is based on EL5 config with just the SLUB turned on.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/