[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071004194604.GA27824@linux-os.sc.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 12:46:04 -0700
From: "Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...ux.intel.com>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Mel Gorman <mel@...net.ie>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
David Chinner <dgc@....com>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>, suresh.b.siddha@...el.com
Subject: Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB
On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 12:05:35PM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > > Was the page allocator pass through patchset
> > > separately applied as I requested?
> >
> > I don't believe so. Suresh?
>
> If it was a git pull then the pass through was included and never taken
> out.
It was a git pull from the performance branch that you pointed out earlier
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/christoph/slab.git;a=log;h=performance
and the config is based on EL5 config with just the SLUB turned on.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists