linux-kernel - Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20071004205812.GQ12049@parisc-linux.org>
Date:	Thu, 4 Oct 2007 14:58:12 -0600
From:	Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	arjan@...radead.org, clameter@....com, willy@...ux.intel.com,
	nickpiggin@...oo.com.au, hch@....de, mel@...net.ie,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	dgc@....com, jens.axboe@...cle.com
Subject: Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB

On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 01:48:34PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> There comes a point where it is the reporter's responsibility to help
> the developer come up with a publishable test case the developer can
> use to work on fixing the problem and help ensure it stays fixed.

That's a lot of effort.  Is it more effort than doing some remote
debugging with Christoph?  I don't know.

> Using an unpublishable benchmark, whose results even cannot be
> published, really stretches the limits of "reasonable" don't you
> think?

Yet here we stand.  Christoph is aggressively trying to get slab removed
from the tree.  There is a testcase which shows slub performing worse
than slab.  It's not my fault I can't publish it.  And just because I
can't publish it doesn't mean it doesn't exist.

Slab needs to not get removed until slub is as good a performer on this
benchmark.

-- 
Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours.  We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/