linux-kernel - Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20071004.140555.85689371.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Thu, 04 Oct 2007 14:05:55 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	matthew@....cx
Cc:	arjan@...radead.org, clameter@....com, willy@...ux.intel.com,
	nickpiggin@...oo.com.au, hch@....de, mel@...net.ie,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	dgc@....com, jens.axboe@...cle.com
Subject: Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB

From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 14:58:12 -0600

> On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 01:48:34PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> > There comes a point where it is the reporter's responsibility to help
> > the developer come up with a publishable test case the developer can
> > use to work on fixing the problem and help ensure it stays fixed.
> 
> That's a lot of effort.  Is it more effort than doing some remote
> debugging with Christoph?  I don't know.

That's a good question and an excellent point.  I'm sure that,
either way, Christoph will be more than willing to engage and
assist.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/