[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E1IdXuZ-0002Sk-00@dorka.pomaz.szeredi.hu>
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2007 23:07:11 +0200
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To: a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl
CC: miklos@...redi.hu, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, wfg@...l.ustc.edu.cn,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] remove throttle_vm_writeout()
> Yeah, I'm guestimating O on a per device basis, but I agree that the
> current ratio limiting is quite crude. I'm not at all sorry to see
> throttle_vm_writeback() go, I just wanted to make a point that what it
> does is not quite without merrit - we agree that it can be done better
> differently.
Yes. So what is it to be?
Is limiting by device queues enough?
Or do we need some global limit?
If so, the cleanest way I see is to separately account and limit
swap-writeback pages, so the global counters don't interfere with the
limiting.
This shouldn't be hard to do, as we have the per-bdi writeback
counting infrastructure already, and also a pseudo bdi for swap in
swapper_space.backing_dev_info.
Miklos
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists