linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2.6.23-rc4] qconf ("make xconfig") Search Dialog Enhancement (rev8)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0710050359021.1817@scrub.home>
Date:	Fri, 5 Oct 2007 04:08:45 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>
To:	Shlomi Fish <shlomif-lkml@...ehackers.org>
cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.23-rc4] qconf ("make xconfig") Search Dialog Enhancement
 (rev8)

Hi,

On Thu, 20 Sep 2007, Shlomi Fish wrote:

> Which specific problems do you see with the coding style of the patch? Can you 
> comment on it?

Mostly whitespace around any braces, please keep it close to the other 
source.

> > I would also prefer to move more of the search functionality into the
> > generic code, so it can be used by other front ends as well, otherwise a
> > lot of this had to be duplicated.
> 
> That would be a good idea, but I cannot use Qt there, which makes my job 
> harder.

Where is the problem with implementing it in C? Just try to keep it a 
simple at first.

> > I think a filter function makes it maybe a bit to flexible, if a front
> > end wants to do some weird filtering, it can still access the symbol
> > data base directly. 
> 
> A filter function would still be convenient in this context, as the symbol 
> data base API may change, and the filter function has a little logic in it.

This API is not really fixed at the moment, so it's not really a problem.

> > So what I have in mind is something like this: 
> >
> > struct symbol **sym_generic_search(const char *pattern, unsigned int
> > flags);
> >
> > This means the back end provides a basic search facility for the most
> > common search operations. The flags would specify what to search (e.g.
> > symbol name, help text, prompts) and how to do it.
> 
> I suggest we don't call it sym_generic_search, as generic implies it is a 
> generic filter. We can call it "sym_string_search" or whatever. Then, I 
> suggest we have separate arguments for every parameter (i.e: search type, 
> case sensitivity, what to search, etc.).

I don't care much about the name, but please keep it as a simple flag, 
which is a lot easier to extend.

bye, Roman

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/