linux-kernel - Re: [Q] APM depends on PM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 5 Oct 2007 17:49:52 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@....de>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [Q] APM depends on PM_SLEEP?

On Friday, 5 October 2007 16:18, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> Why does APM depend on PM_SLEEP?

Because APM uses the suspend core functions in drivers/base/power .

> So without sleep support you cannot use "Make CPU Idle calls when idle ",
> "Use real mode APM BIOS call to power off" etc? Found in 23-rc9-git of
> yesterday. 

Selecting CONFIG_SUSPEND without ACPI only causes the suspend core (used
by APM) and kernel/power/main.c to be compiled in.

Greetings,
Rafael
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/