linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] remove throttle_vm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 5 Oct 2007 11:43:00 -0400
From:	"John Stoffel" <john@...ffel.org>
To:	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc:	a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	wfg@...l.ustc.edu.cn, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] remove throttle_vm_writeout()

>> I think that's an improvement in all respects.
>> 
>> However it still does not generally address the deadlock scenario: if
>> there's a small DMA zone, and fuse manages to put all of those pages
>> under writeout, then there's trouble.

Miklos> And the only way to solve that AFAICS, is to make sure fuse
Miklos> never uses more than e.g. 50% of _any_ zone for page cache.
Miklos> And that may need some tweaking in the allocator...

So what happens if I have three different FUSE mounts, all under heavy
write pressure?  It's not a FUSE problem, it's a VM problem as far as
I can see.   All I did was extrapolate from the 50% number (where did
that come from?) and triple it to go over 100%, since we obviously
shouldn't take 100% of any zone, right?

So the real cure is to have some way to rate limit Zone usage, making
it harder and harder to allocate in a zone as the zone gets more and
more full.  But how do you do this in a non-deadlocky way?  

Buy hey, I'm not that knowledgeable about the VM.  
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/