[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <C32C1AD6.167B3%keir@xensource.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2007 16:46:14 +0100
From: Keir Fraser <keir@...source.com>
To: Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>
CC: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...ell.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
Ken Chen <kenchen@...gle.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: race with page_referenced_one->ptep_test_and_clear_young and
pagetable setup/pulldown
On 5/10/07 16:33, "Hugh Dickins" <hugh@...itas.com> wrote:
> If a 2.6.23 fix is needed, I suggest simply excluding split ptlocks
> in the Xen case, as shown by the mm/Kconfig - line in Jan's patch.
I didn't think that nobbling config options for particular pv_ops
implementations was acceptable? I'm rather out of the loop though, and could
be wrong.
The PREEMPT_BITS limitation is a good argument for at least taking the pte
locks in small batches though (small batches is preferable to one-by-one
since we will want to batch the make-readonly-and-pin hypercall requests to
amortise the cost of the hypervisor trap).
-- Keir
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists