[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <470580F7.4030100@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2007 20:10:31 -0400
From: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>
To: William Cattey <wdc@....EDU>
CC: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, Chuck Anderson <cra@....EDU>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Subject: Re: vm86.c audit_syscall_exit() call trashes registers
On 10/04/2007 07:58 PM, William Cattey wrote:
>
> Sadly, the effect of the patch is the same as the most recent candidate
> patch from Jeremy Fitzhardinge: The EDID transfer still comes up all
> zeros.
>
I think maybe a better question is: why does read_edid still work?
The X server might be making some invalid assumption about system
state. Comparing the code the two programs use could provide some clues.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists