[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071005145828.17ba9c69@cuia.boston.redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 14:58:28 -0400
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To: Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
Keir Fraser <keir@...source.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: race with page_referenced_one->ptep_test_and_clear_young and
pagetable setup/pulldown
On Fri, 5 Oct 2007 12:36:33 +0100 (BST)
Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com> wrote:
> To my naive mind, your problem actually lies in those two stages:
> whatever marks the pages RO should not be keeping Xen in ignorance.
It does. Telling Xen to pin the page as a page table page is
basically the first thing a Xen kernel does after marking the
page read-only.
This makes for a narrow race window, during which ptep_test_and_clear_young
cannot clear the referenced bit and may end up causing a crash. We do not
care about it not clearing the referenced bit during that window, since it
will be cleared during the next go-around and the race is very rare.
Hence, the only thing we need to fix is the crash.
We can do that by adding an entry for ptep_test_and_clear_young to the
exception table. This way we do not need to turn this into a new paravirt
ops hook (since the fast path is exactly the same as x86 native) and there
is no need for added complexity.
Also, Xen would not conflict with SPLIT_PTLOCK_CPUS.
--
All Rights Reversed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists