[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200710052316.10215.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 23:16:09 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@....de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [Q] APM depends on PM_SLEEP?
On Friday, 5 October 2007 18:27, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Oct 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> > On Friday, 5 October 2007 16:18, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > > Why does APM depend on PM_SLEEP?
> >
> > Because APM uses the suspend core functions in drivers/base/power .
>
> Ok, perhaps, a "select" would be better?...
Select doesn't work really well.
It probably would be better to add something like APM_SUSPEND
depending on SUSPEND.
Greetings,
Rafael
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists