[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <jezlyxmfbx.fsf@sykes.suse.de>
Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2007 23:17:22 +0200
From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@...e.de>
To: Timur Tabi <timur@...escale.com>
Cc: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
Timur Tabi <timur@...escale.com> writes:
> Then I don't understand that point of defining __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD.
> What does it mean for a C-level bitfield ordering to be little-endian if
> the processor is BIG_ENDIAN?
Byte endianess and bit endianness are orthogonal concecpts. A cpu can
have insns using both little and big endian bit addressing (btst
vs. bftst on m68k). The bitfield ordering is a property of the ABI and
may even be different from how the cpu numbers the bits in its ISA.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@...e.de
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
PGP key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists