lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4706AD62.6030705@freescale.com>
Date:	Fri, 05 Oct 2007 16:32:18 -0500
From:	Timur Tabi <timur@...escale.com>
To:	Andreas Schwab <schwab@...e.de>
CC:	Anton Altaparmakov <aia21@....ac.uk>,
	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD

Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Timur Tabi <timur@...escale.com> writes:
> 
>> The CPU shift operation, yes.  I'm talking about shift operations on
>> external memory-mapped devices.
> 
> That is a property of how the device is wired to the bus.  The cpu will
> always put a value of 128 on the bus such that D7 = 1 and D0-D6 = 0.

Yes, but is D7 on the left or on the right?

Anyway, this is academic now.  I now know that __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD is not 
what I want, and that there's no macro that will tell how the lines from the 
CPU to external memory are mapped.

-- 
Timur Tabi
Linux Kernel Developer @ Freescale
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ