[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4706AD62.6030705@freescale.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2007 16:32:18 -0500
From: Timur Tabi <timur@...escale.com>
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab@...e.de>
CC: Anton Altaparmakov <aia21@....ac.uk>,
Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Timur Tabi <timur@...escale.com> writes:
>
>> The CPU shift operation, yes. I'm talking about shift operations on
>> external memory-mapped devices.
>
> That is a property of how the device is wired to the bus. The cpu will
> always put a value of 128 on the bus such that D7 = 1 and D0-D6 = 0.
Yes, but is D7 on the left or on the right?
Anyway, this is academic now. I now know that __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD is not
what I want, and that there's no macro that will tell how the lines from the
CPU to external memory are mapped.
--
Timur Tabi
Linux Kernel Developer @ Freescale
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists