[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20071005161305.af27f452.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 16:13:05 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
Cc: nickpiggin@...oo.com.au, randy.dunlap@...cle.com,
menage@...gle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dino@...ibm.com,
pj@....com, cpw@....com, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpuset and sched domains: sched_load_balance flag fixes
On Wed, 03 Oct 2007 04:44:01 -0700
Paul Jackson <pj@....com> wrote:
> From: Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
>
> Thanks to Randy Dunlap for the review that caught
> some of the following.
>
> Some bug fixes and coding style fixes:
> 1) only one statement per line, please.
> 2) don't need to guard kfree() calls with a NULL check
> 3) use kfifo_free, not kfree, if it came from kfifo_alloc
> 4) a pair of curly brackets got lost along the way
> 5) missing .read, .write callbacks for sched_load_balance
>
> Without (3), one kfifo buffer memory was leaked each time
> one rebuilt scheduler domains
>
> Without (4), the current task was summarily killed each
> time one tried to rebuild scheduler domains
>
> Without (5), every read or write system call on a per-cpuset
> special file 'sched_load_balance' failed, EINVAL.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
>
> ---
>
> Andrew,
>
> These fixes go right after the patch they fix:
> [PATCH] cpuset and sched domains: sched_load_balance flag
I'm getting 100% rejects from this - probably whatever patch it is
patching got lost or unrecognisably mangled.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists