[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4705BA56.5080605@goop.org>
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2007 21:15:18 -0700
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
CC: Hugh Dickens <hugh@...itas.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
Keir Fraser <keir@...source.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: race with page_referenced_one->ptep_test_and_clear_young and
pagetable setup/pulldown
Rik van Riel wrote:
> Either of these two would work. Another alternative could be to
> let test_and_clear_pte_flags have an exception table entry, where
> we jump right to the next instruction if the instruction clearing
> the flag fails.
>
> That is the essentially variant you need for Xen, except the fast
> path is still exactly the same it is as when running on native
> hardware.
>
Hm, that wouldn't end up clearing the bit. You'd need a Xen-specific
exception handler to do that, which would turn the whole thing into
Xen-specific code, and you're back at adding a pv-op.
J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists