linux-kernel - Re: Linux 2.6.23-rc9 and a heads-up for the 2.6.24 series..

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20071005053813.GA25242@elte.hu>
Date:	Fri, 5 Oct 2007 07:38:13 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Alistair John Strachan <alistair@...zero.co.uk>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.23-rc9 and a heads-up for the 2.6.24 series..


* Alistair John Strachan <alistair@...zero.co.uk> wrote:

> On Tuesday 02 October 2007 04:41:49 Linus Torvalds wrote:
> [snip]
> > In other words, people who know they may be affected and would want to
> > prepare can look at (for example)
> >
> > 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tglx/linux-2.6-x86.git x86
> >
> > and generally get ready for the switch-over.
> 
> This is certainly a tool issue, but if I use Debian's kernel-image "make-kpkg" 
> wrapper around the kernel build system, it fails with:
> 
> cp: cannot stat `arch/x86_64/boot/bzImage': No such file or directory
> 
> Obviously, this file has moved to arch/x86/boot, but it seems like 
> possibly unnecessary breakage. I've been copying bzImage for years 
> from arch/x86_64/boot, and I'm sure there's a handful of scripts 
> (other than Debian's kernel-image) doing this too.
> 
> For now, I hacked the tool[1]. Maybe, if we care, a symlink could be 
> set up between arch/x86/boot and arch/$ARCH/boot ? Or would papering 
> over this be more trouble than it's worth?

yeah, a symlink is the right solution i think. Our first-step goal is to 
make the switchover seamless for all practical purposes, and a 
compatibility symlink in arch/i386/boot/ will not hurt. (we shouldnt 
worry about the really old zImage target though)

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/