linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] Colored kernel output (run2)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 6 Oct 2007 23:03:38 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
To:	Oleg Verych <olecom@...wer.upol.cz>
cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
	Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>,
	Medve Emilian-EMMEDVE1 <Emilian.Medve@...escale.com>,
	Helge Deller <deller@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Colored kernel output (run2)

On Oct 6 2007 23:03, Oleg Verych wrote:
>> 
>> (btw., i corrected the subject line to remove the 'NAK'. Why do you 
>> think you can 'NAK' a patch in this field?)
>
>I added comment (like this), so anyone can skip reading body, if headers
>are "Oleg Verych && NAK". In case if `NAK' have a magic meaning in the
>LKML, like control characters in the tty, i'm sorry.
>
>But how to express opinion quickly and easily?

You can't. I think that people will usually be interested _why_ you
voted for or against something (given the number of vote-submitters
does not go through the roof). That clearly won't fit into the subject,
and even if RFC822 allowed it, it's only displayed like 40 chars wide.
The submitter (me in this case) will even look at *all* mails, so as to
(1) address the NAKs and (2) address the hidden feature requests in
ACKs.  :-)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/