[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20071005232849.5eede577.pj@sgi.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 23:28:49 -0700
From: Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, nickpiggin@...oo.com.au,
randy.dunlap@...cle.com, menage@...gle.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dino@...ibm.com, cpw@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpuset and sched domains: sched_load_balance flag fixes
> i'd suggest we go with what we have now
Ok - I'll try sending this against 2.6.23-rc8-mm2
in a couple of hours, if it goes well.
> We cannot merge it via sched.git because it has some containers
> (or other?) dependencies, right?
This sched_load_balance flag patch collides with the cgroup
(aka container) patches if I'm not careful, yes.
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@....com> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists