[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071006075415.GA8930@gollum.tnic>
Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 09:54:15 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bbpetkov@...oo.de>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...dspring.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, muli@...ibm.com,
satyam@...radead.org, amitkale@...xen.com,
achim_leubner@...ptec.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] unify DMA_..BIT_MASK definitions: v3.1
On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 02:23:41PM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > or you could take advantage of the macros in kernel.h and write that
> > as:
> >
> > +#define DMA_BIT_MASK(n) (((n) == 64) ? ULLONG_MAX : ((1ULL<<(n))-1))
> >
>
> But that's a more indirect way of expressing "I want all 1's".
... and ULLONG_MAX _is_ (~0ULL).
--
Regards/Gruß,
Boris.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists