lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47095967.8060608@gelato.unsw.edu.au>
Date:	Mon, 08 Oct 2007 08:10:47 +1000
From:	Joshua Root <jmr@...ato.unsw.edu.au>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC:	"Alan D. Brunelle" <Alan.Brunelle@...com>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	btrace <linux-btrace@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Linux Kernel Markers - performance characterization with large
 IO load on large-ish system

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> actually, the pure marker overhead seems to be a regression:
> 
> Kernel Options       Min val    Avg val    Max val    Std Dev
>> - markers - bt cfg  15.349127  16.169459  16.372980   0.184417
>> + markers - bt cfg  15.280382  16.202398  16.409257   0.191861
> 
> why isnt the marker near zero-cost as it should be? (as long as they are 
> enabled but are not in actual use) 2% increase is _ALOT_.

The increase in the mean is actually 0.033, or 0.2%.

> So there's something wrong going on - either markers have unacceptably 
> high cost, or the measurement is not valid.

The third option is that the measurement just needs to be done more 
times. The standard error in the mean for the + markers case is
0.191861 / sqrt(10) = 0.061, which is twice the size of the difference 
being measured.
-- 
Joshua Root,  jmr AT gelato.unsw.edu.au
http://www.gelato.unsw.edu.au
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ