[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47090F55.3020800@colorfullife.com>
Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2007 18:54:45 +0200
From: Manfred Spraul <manfred@...orfullife.com>
To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>
CC: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>,
Ayaz Abdulla <aabdulla@...dia.com>,
nedev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: MSI interrupts and disable_irq
Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> Interested parties should try the forcedeth patches I just posted :)
>
The patches look good, but I would still prefer to understand why the
current implementation causes crashes before rewriting everything.
I've just noticed that netpoll_send_skb() calls ->hard_start_xmit() and
->poll() within local_irq_save().
Thus it seems that spin_lock_irqsave() must be used in the poll() and
hard_start_xmit() callbacks, at least in nics that support
POLL_CONTROLLER :-(
--
Manfred
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists