lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20071007095853.13a8755d@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 09:58:53 -0700 From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org> To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: lockdep: how to tell it multiple pte locks is OK? On Sat, 06 Oct 2007 23:31:33 -0700 > I'm presume I'm the first person to try holding multiple pte locks at > once, so there's no existing locking order for these locks. I'm > always traversing and locking the pagetable in virtual address order > (and this seems like a sane-enough rule for anyone else who wants to > hold multiple pte locks). I'm not sure that's a valid assumption in light of things like sharing pagetables between processes etc etc.. (granted, that one is out of tree right now but I still hope it'll go in some day:) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists