[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200710071920.l97JKJX5018871@agora.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu>
Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 15:20:19 -0400
From: Erez Zadok <ezk@...sunysb.edu>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: "Ryan Finnie" <ryan@...nie.org>, Colin Watson <cjwatson@...ntu.com>
Subject: msync(2) bug(?), returns AOP_WRITEPAGE_ACTIVATE to userland
According to vfs.txt, ->writepage() may return AOP_WRITEPAGE_ACTIVATE back
to the VFS/VM. Indeed some filesystems such as tmpfs can return
AOP_WRITEPAGE_ACTIVATE; and stackable file systems (e.g., Unionfs) also
return AOP_WRITEPAGE_ACTIVATE if the lower f/s returned it.
Anyway, some Ubuntu users of Unionfs reported that msync(2) sometimes
returns AOP_WRITEPAGE_ACTIVATE (decimal 524288) back to userland.
Therefore, some user programs fail, esp. if they're written such as this:
err = msync(...);
if (err != 0)
// fail
They temporarily fixed the specific program in question (apt-get) to check
if (err < 0)
// fail
Is this a bug indeed, or are user programs supposed to handle
AOP_WRITEPAGE_ACTIVATE (I hope not the latter). If it's a kernel bug, what
should the kernel return: a zero, or an -errno (and which one)?
Thanks,
Erez.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists