linux-kernel - Re: RFC: reviewer's statement of oversight

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <84144f020710081031m30600714q70b8071920eea4c2@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 8 Oct 2007 20:31:37 +0300
From:	"Pekka Enberg" <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To:	"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@....net>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RFC: reviewer's statement of oversight

Hi Jonathan,

On 10/8/07, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net> wrote:
> As I was trying to sleep last night, it occurred to me that what we
> might need is an equivalent of the DCO for the Reviewed-by tag.  To that
> end, I dedicated a few minutes of my life to the following bit of text.
> It's really just meant to be a starting point for the discussion.  Is
> the following something close to what we understand Reviewed-by to mean?

[snip]

Looks good but how is this different from the Acked-by tag we are already using?

                                     Pekka
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/