[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20071007.230407.07619446.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2007 23:04:07 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: viro@....linux.org.uk
Cc: arnd@...db.de, jens.axboe@...cle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
hch@....de
Subject: Re: [patch 0/9] compat_ioctl: introduce block/compat_ioctl.c
From: Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 06:12:18 +0100
> On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 08:19:02PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > This is my block ioctl series split up into managable chunks. I'm not
> > really sure about the last two of these, I'd prefer to get a second
> > opinion on those.
> >
> > Please apply once your tests have gone though.
>
> BTW, one note: 0x1260 thing (
> /* The mkswap binary hard codes it to Intel value :-((( */
> case 0x1260:
> case BLKGETSIZE:
> ) is an ancient piece of BS. It had appeared in 2.1.115-pre3 and AFAICS
> it's a misunderstanding.
...
> IOW, that stuff is useless and always had been. In the current form it's
> simply invalid C on e.g. amd64 - you get duplicate case there, which breaks
> the build.
>
> I'd simply kill that.
Agreed.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists